Ackerstein:With football holding firm as the last major sport still dominatedby Americans, it only makes sense that the Super Bowl be played right in theheartland of the United States, Nebraska?s Memorial Stadium.Holding the most-watched sporting event of the year in acity not traditionally viewed as glamorous may seem out of line with the recentnorm, but it is just what the NFL needs to restore the true meaning of theSuper Bowl: football.Playing the game in Nebraska is the remedy the event needsto get back to its roots now that it has become just as much of a party as ithas a football game. When recent hosts like Miami, Phoenix and Houston hold thegame, there are plenty of glitzy places for the stars to hold parties, takingattention away from the game itself. Sure Maxim, Victoria?s Secret and Playboy can still hosttheir star-studded Super Bowl parties in Nebraska, but good luck finding hiphangouts loaded with paparazzi in Lincoln, and just try convincing Paris Hiltonand John Mayer to make the trip out to a state that has about as many hotnightclubs as it does beaches.Unlike other sites, in Nebraska it is Tom, and not Ozzy,Kelly or Jack, who?s the most likely Osborne to have his picture taken.With fewer people coming to the Super Bowl for the parties,more tickets become available for real fans, bringing the sport?s mostimportant game back to the people who matter most.Plus, playing the game in a state without a professionalteam eliminates the possibility that a team has a home-field advantage in thebig game, although only having it in Detroit, Miami and Phoenix practicallyguarantees that as well. Less glitz and more hits. Nebraska for the win.Mason:Nebraska? Are you kidding me? Who on earth would want totravel to Lincoln for the Super Bowl?I’ve got to rack my brain to think of things to do inNebraska. Right now, all I can think to do there is husk corn. Good luckgetting the media, fans, Playboy and Victoria’s Secret models there for aweek-long excursion, especially in early February. (It could be as cold as 26degrees on Super Bowl Sunday in Lincoln this weekend.)So if not Nebraska, then where should the next big game be played?Simple: Hawaii.But wait, isn’t the Pro Bowl already played there? Yes,which is why I say we do away with the Pro Bowl and just have Honolulu host theSuper Bowl instead. Football’s version of an all-star game is one of the leastentertaining to watch anyway.And what’s wrong with the fact that the Super Bowl hasturned into a media frenzy and party central? That’s half the fun of the weeklongpreparation for the game.Just picture pregame tailgates with pigs roasting on spits,hula dancers shaking their grass skirts and plenty of poi and tropical drinksto go around. Plus, you can’t beat the Hawaiian weather, no matter what time ofyear it is.And Mike wants a state without a professional team, he says.What a coincidence, because Hawaii has zero pro sports franchises.As far as travel is concerned, I realize Honolulu is a bitfarther than Lincoln to travel to for most people. But if you’re going to spendan exorbitant amount of money to go to the game, you might as well make itworth your while and travel somewhere enjoyable. Super Bowl XLIII in Hawaii. Aloha.
COURTS: A man issued with a speeding summons claimed he didn’t pay the fine because he didn’t own the car at the time the speeding offence occurred.Joseph Kerr, with an address at Glebe, Ballyae, Ramelton said he had sold the car a few days prior to when the speeding offence occurred. The speeding offence occurred on the 25th of October 2015.However, the court heard that Mr Kerr had sold the car a few days previously.Mr Kerr told the court, “I received a speeding summons for an offence which occurred on October 25th, 2015.“But I sold the car a few days prior to that, and contacted the fella I had sold the car too to tell him that I had received a summons for speeding.“I was under the belief that he would sort it out and pay the fine.“I thought it had been sorted, but then I received a summons for court over the non-payment of the fine.”Judge Paul Kelly struck out the speeding offence against the defendant.MAN WAS ISSUED WITH SPEEDING SUMMONS DAYS AFTER HE SOLD HIS CAR was last modified: March 22nd, 2016 by Mark ForkerShare this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Tags:courtsnewsOffenceownershipspeedingvehicle